Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:20-cv-10015
E.D. Mich.May 21, 2025Background
- Plaintiff Leonard C. A. challenged the denial of his disability insurance benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security.
- The case was initially remanded by stipulation for further proceedings before the Social Security Administration.
- After a second unfavorable administrative decision, the Appeals Council reversed and awarded a fully favorable decision to the Plaintiff in September 2024.
- Plaintiff’s attorney, Charles A. Robison, subsequently filed a motion seeking attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), totaling $27,772.25.
- The Commissioner of Social Security did not oppose the motion for attorneys’ fees.
- Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti recommended granting the motion, finding the requested fee reasonable and instructing counsel to refund a previously received $1,432.27 to Plaintiff.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reasonableness of requested attorney's fees | Fee is reasonable under § 406(b) | No support or opposition stated | Fee request reasonable and granted |
| Refund of previously awarded fees | Will refund upon awarding | No position stated | Attorney must refund Plaintiff $1,432.27 after new fee disbursed |
| Adoption of Report and Recommendation (R&R) | R&R should be adopted | No objections to R&R | R&R adopted as no objection filed |
| Right to appeal after failure to object | (No stated position) | (No stated position) | Right to appeal forfeited due to no timely objections |
Key Cases Cited
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985) (parties forfeit right to appeal factual findings if no objection is filed to magistrate’s report and recommendation)
- Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520 (6th Cir. 2019) (enforcing forfeiture of appellate rights for failing to object to a report and recommendation)
