History
  • No items yet
midpage
Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
1:20-cv-10015
E.D. Mich.
May 21, 2025
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 1:20-cv-10015-TLL-APP ECF No. 16, PageID.62 Filed 05/21/25 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

LEONARD C. A, Case No. 1:20-cv-10015

Plaintiff, Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge v.

Honorable Anthony P. Patti COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, United States Magistrate Judge

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

On January 3, 2020, Plaintiff Leonard C. A. sued the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) following an administrative decision that denied his claim for disability insurance benefits. ECF No. 1. On March 25, 2020, based on the Parties’ stipulation, this Court remanded the case to the Social Security Administration (SSA) for further proceedings. See ECF Nos. 9; 10. On remand, after an Administrative Law Judge issued a decision unfavorable to Plaintiff, the Appeals Council for the SSA issued a fully favorable decision in September 2024. ECF No. 12 at PageID.28–29. And on March 9, 2025, the SSA informed Plaintiff about the benefits to which he is entitled. ECF No. 12-1 at PageID.38–39.

On March 26, 2025, Plaintiff’s Counsel—Attorney Charles A. Robison—moved for $27,772.25 in attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ECF No. 12. The Commissioner neither supported nor opposed the Motion. See id. at PageID.32. This Court referred the Motion to Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. ECF No. 14.

On April 28, 2025, Judge Patti issued a report (R&R), recommending that this Court grant Plaintiffs’ Motion. ECF No. 15. To that end, Judge Patti found that Plaintiff’s Counsel’s requested

Case 1:20-cv-10015-TLL-APP ECF No. 16, PageID.63 Filed 05/21/25 Page 2 of 2 amount of $27,772.25 was reasonable based on the amount of work that he completed for the case when compared to prevailing market rates and his experience. See id. at PageID.54–59. Judge Patti also noted that, assuming this Court adopted the R&R, once Attorney Robison received the awarded attorneys’ fees, he would need to refund Plaintiff $1,432.27 for fees that he had already received. Id. at PageID.59–60. Judge Patti provided the Parties 14 days to object, id. at PageID.60– 61, but the Parties did not do so. Thus, they have forfeited their right to appeal Judge Patti’s findings. See Berkshire v. Dahl , 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). There is no clear error in the R&R.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 15, is ADOPTED.

Further, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, ECF No. 12, is GRANTED .

Further, it is ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security is DIRECTED to disburse $27,772.25 from the representative fees withheld from Plaintiff’s past-due benefits to Attorney Charles A. Robison, upon presentation of this Order. Upon receipt of this fee, Attorney Robison must refund Plaintiff $1,432.27 .

Dated: May 21, 2025 s/Thomas L. Ludington THOMAS L. LUDINGTON United States District Judge - 2 -

Case Details

Case Name: Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court Name: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Date Published: May 21, 2025
Docket Number: 1:20-cv-10015
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Mich.
Read the detailed case summary
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.