History
  • No items yet
midpage
490 S.W.3d 562
Tex. App.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Amerigroup (Medicaid MCO) sued out-of-network Town Park for recovery of alleged overpayments for 239 dental procedures, asserting an oral agreement to pay Medicaid rates going forward.
  • Amerigroup employee Nancy Jones testified she called Town Park in 2004–2006, spoke with scheduler Joann Deases (who said to contact management), and then had a single conversation with a billing/administrator employee (inferred to be Sourabh Sanduja) who allegedly agreed to accept Medicaid rates for future procedures.
  • Town Park usually billed full charges; Amerigroup paid amounts between full charges and the Medicaid rate for each procedure. Amerigroup alleged breach of contract and equitable claims (money had and received; unjust enrichment).
  • Town Park moved for summary judgment (including a no-evidence challenge to apparent authority and a traditional summary judgment on equitable claims based on limitations); the trial court granted summary judgment on the contract and equitable claims.
  • After the trial court’s partial summary judgment on equitable claims, Amerigroup amended its petition and omitted those equitable claims; the court entered final judgment dismissing Amerigroup’s remaining claims.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there is evidence of apparent authority to bind Town Park to accept Medicaid rates for future services Jones’s testimony that an administrator (Sanduja) orally agreed to accept Medicaid rates and that Town Park dealt with Dr. Ralph supports apparent authority No evidence of principal’s conduct that would lead a reasonable person to believe the employee had authority to bind Town Park for future Medicaid-rate agreements No evidence of apparent authority; summary judgment for Town Park affirmed
Whether a defendant may obtain summary judgment via a no-evidence motion on apparent authority Amerigroup argued a no-evidence MSJ cannot be used to dispose of an affirmative defense for which defendant bears burden Town Park argued Amerigroup bore burden to prove apparent authority, so a no-evidence challenge was proper No-evidence motion was a proper vehicle because the party asserting agency/apparent authority bears the burden of proof
Whether Amerigroup’s course-of-dealing or other documentary notes raised a fact issue on authority Amerigroup pointed to repeated authorizations, screen-shot notes, and industry practice of ‘‘establishing everything’’ on first referral as evidence of course of dealing and contemporaneous reconfirmations Town Park argued there was only one conversation with the administrator, no manifestations by Town Park ratifying such authority, and Jones did not know the administrator’s title or scope Course-of-dealing and documentary notes were insufficient; no manifestations by Town Park that would make reliance reasonable
Whether Amerigroup preserved appellate review of equitable claims after amending its petition Amerigroup argued Rule 65’s limitations exception allowed review because the partial summary judgment was based on limitations Town Park argued Amerigroup waived error by omitting equitable claims in its amended petition Court held Amerigroup waived any error; Rule 65 exception did not apply to resurrect omitted claims

Key Cases Cited

  • Gaines v. Kelly, 235 S.W.3d 179 (Tex. 2007) (apparent-authority standard and relevance of principal’s conduct)
  • IRA Res., Inc. v. Griego, 221 S.W.3d 592 (Tex. 2007) (party alleging agency bears burden of proof)
  • Hamilton v. Wilson, 249 S.W.3d 425 (Tex. 2008) (no-evidence summary judgment review standard)
  • Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. Fielding, 289 S.W.3d 844 (Tex. 2009) (credit evidence favorable to non-movant when reasonable)
  • FM Props. Operating Co. v. City of Austin, 22 S.W.3d 868 (Tex. 2000) (affirmance where any meritorious ground supports summary judgment)
  • Randolph v. Walker, 29 S.W.3d 271 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000) (amended pleading supersedes prior pleadings; omitted claims are waived)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Amerigroup Texas, Inc. v. True View Surgery Center, L.P.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Feb 11, 2016
Citations: 490 S.W.3d 562; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 1423; 2016 WL 552161; NO. 14-15-00086-CV
Docket Number: NO. 14-15-00086-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    Amerigroup Texas, Inc. v. True View Surgery Center, L.P., 490 S.W.3d 562