History
  • No items yet
midpage
Acordia of Ohio, L.L.C. v. Fishel
133 Ohio St. 3d 345
| Ohio | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Employees Fishel, Freytag, Taber, and Diefenbach signed two-year noncompete agreements with their respective employers dating 1993–2000.
  • The agreements lack any express language extending to successors or assigns.
  • Rauh & Company became Acordia of Cincinnati, Inc. after a 1994 acquisition by Acordia, Inc.; the Cincinnati entity later merged into Acordia of Ohio, Inc. in 1997.
  • Wells Fargo acquired Acordia, Inc. in 2001 and required new employment forms from employees.
  • Seven months after Wells Fargo's acquisition, Acordia, Inc. merged with Acordia of Ohio, L.L.C. (the L.L.C.); only the L.L.C. remained after the merger.
  • Employees subsequently left the L.L.C. for Neace Lukens in 2005 and recruited customers from the L.L.C., creating the dispute over enforceability of the noncompetes.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether noncompete agreements transfer by operation of law after a merger. L.L.C. asserts transfers occur by operation of law and survive as enforceable. Employees argue the agreements are not enforceable by the surviving entity and do not extend beyond the original contracts. Transfers occur, but enforceability remains limited to original terms.
Whether the surviving company may enforce the transferred noncompetes as if it had signed them. L.L.C. maintains it may enforce under operation of law. Employees contend the agreements do not bind the surviving entity beyond the original parties and terms. Enforceability limited to terms and period; cannot expand to successors.
What is the effective termination trigger and duration for the noncompetes after merger? L.L.C. contends post-merger enforcement is valid. Employees argue the noncompete periods expire once the original employer ceases to exist. Noncompete periods expire within two years after termination with the original employer; merger does not reset them.

Key Cases Cited

  • Rogers v. Runfola & Assocs., Inc., 57 Ohio St.3d 5 (1991) (noncompete enforceable when business structure changes but business remains)
  • Morris v. Invest. Life Ins. Co., 27 Ohio St.2d 26 (1971) (merger effects and continuation of entity)
  • Marfield v. Cincinnati, D. & T. Traction Co., 111 Ohio St.139 (1924) (consolidated entity steps into shoes of constituent companies)
  • ASA Architects, Inc. v. Schlegel, 75 Ohio St.3d 666 (1996) (contracts binding on surviving entity absent explicit merger language)
  • Raimonde v. Van Vlerah, 42 Ohio St.2d 21 (1975) (noncompete reasonableness standards for enforcement)
  • Lake Land Emp. Group of Akron, L.L.C. v. Columber, 101 Ohio St.3d 242 (2004) (reasonableness and scope of noncompete covenants)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Acordia of Ohio, L.L.C. v. Fishel
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 24, 2012
Citation: 133 Ohio St. 3d 345
Docket Number: 2011-0163
Court Abbreviation: Ohio