History
  • No items yet
midpage
190518-19140
190518-19140
| Board of Vet. App. | Sep 29, 2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served in the U.S. Army (Jun 1959–Jun 1962; Jul 1962–Jul 1968), MOS military policeman, with combat service in the Republic of Vietnam and conceded in-service hazardous noise exposure.
  • STRs show no formal diagnosis of right-ear hearing loss at entry/separation, but a September 1962 reenlistment audiogram shows a 15 dB threshold shift at 4000 Hz relative to an April 1962 exam.
  • July 1968 separation audiogram recorded large threshold readings later deemed testing errors by an ENT on retest; ENT results showed normal hearing at separation.
  • Veteran reports noticing hearing difficulty in his early 20s (while in service) and continuous symptoms since then; he testified at a June 2021 Board hearing.
  • VA examinations (Apr 2018 and Sep 2018 addendum) conceded hazardous noise exposure and left-ear nexus but opined no nexus for the right ear based on normal entrance/separation results; the examiner did not address the Sept 1962 15 dB shift.
  • Board reviewed the record under the AMA Hearing docket, found the evidence in relative equipoise as to a nexus, afforded the Veteran the benefit of the doubt, and granted service connection for right ear hearing loss.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Existence of a current right-ear hearing disability Audiograms and VA finding that right ear meets VA disability criteria N/A (VA conceded right-ear hearing loss for VA purposes) Right-ear hearing loss found to meet VA disability criteria (granted)
In-service event/exposure Military policeman duties, qualifying/firing small arms and heavier weapons, combat in Vietnam produced hazardous noise N/A (VA conceded hazardous noise exposure) Board conceded in-service hazardous noise exposure
Nexus between current hearing loss and service 15 dB threshold shift in Sept 1962, continuous symptoms since service, and grant of left-ear service connection support a nexus VA examiner relied on normal ENT retest at separation and entrance/safety readings to deny nexus; did not address the 1962 15 dB shift Evidence in relative equipoise; benefit of the doubt given to Veteran; nexus found and service connection granted
Adequacy of VA medical opinion Veteran argues the 1962 threshold shift and testimony were not addressed by examiner, making examiner opinion incomplete Examiner asserted July 1968 large shifts were testing errors and relied on ENT retest, concluding no permanent threshold shift Board found examiner failed to address the 1962 15 dB shift for the right ear; thus examiner opinion was not dispositive and did not overcome lay and objective evidence

Key Cases Cited

  • Saunders v. Wilkie, 886 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (elements required to establish service connection)
  • Walker v. Shinseki, 708 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (chronic disease presumptions and continuity of symptomatology)
  • Ledford v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 87 (1992) (absence of in-service documentation of condition does not preclude service connection)
  • Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (1993) (current hearing loss plus a medically sound basis linking it to service can support service connection)
  • Holton v. Shinseki, 557 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (application of the benefit-of-the-doubt/equipoise rule)
  • Washington v. Nicholson, 19 Vet. App. 362 (2005) (competence and probative value of veteran's lay testimony)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 190518-19140
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Sep 29, 2021
Docket Number: 190518-19140
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.