History
  • No items yet
midpage
15-09 504
15-09 504
| Board of Vet. App. | Jul 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served on active duty Aug 1959–Aug 1961 and appealed a July 2013 RO rating decision denying a compensable rating for service‑connected hearing loss.
  • Board previously remanded in July 2016 for a new VA audiologic examination; the remand exam was performed in November 2016.
  • Relevant VA audiograms (July 2011, July 2013, Nov 2016) consistently show pure‑tone averages and speech discrimination placing the Veteran at level I hearing impairment in both ears.
  • Combined binaural values based on those tests yield a noncompensable evaluation under 38 C.F.R. § 4.85, Diagnostic Code 6100.
  • Veteran asserted worsening hearing related to onset of tinnitus; the Board referred the tinnitus claim back to the AOJ for adjudication and did not decide service connection for tinnitus here.
  • Board denied an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss and found the preponderance of evidence against a higher rating; benefit‑of‑the‑doubt rule not applied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Entitlement to an initial compensable rating for service‑connected hearing loss Hearing loss worsened (Veteran cites tinnitus onset) and merits a compensable rating Objective audiograms demonstrate level I impairment both ears, producing a noncompensable rating; tinnitus claim must be adjudicated by RO Denied—no compensable rating; audiometric evidence yields noncompensable evaluation; tinnitus referred to AOJ

Key Cases Cited

  • Scott v. McDonald, 789 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (limits Board discussion to relevant evidence and issues on appeal)
  • Robinson v. Peake, 21 Vet. App. 545 (2008) (Board need only discuss evidence material to its decision)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 15-09 504
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Jul 31, 2017
Docket Number: 15-09 504
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.