15-09 504
15-09 504
| Board of Vet. App. | Jul 31, 2017Background
- Veteran served on active duty Aug 1959–Aug 1961 and appealed a July 2013 RO rating decision denying a compensable rating for service‑connected hearing loss.
- Board previously remanded in July 2016 for a new VA audiologic examination; the remand exam was performed in November 2016.
- Relevant VA audiograms (July 2011, July 2013, Nov 2016) consistently show pure‑tone averages and speech discrimination placing the Veteran at level I hearing impairment in both ears.
- Combined binaural values based on those tests yield a noncompensable evaluation under 38 C.F.R. § 4.85, Diagnostic Code 6100.
- Veteran asserted worsening hearing related to onset of tinnitus; the Board referred the tinnitus claim back to the AOJ for adjudication and did not decide service connection for tinnitus here.
- Board denied an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss and found the preponderance of evidence against a higher rating; benefit‑of‑the‑doubt rule not applied.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement to an initial compensable rating for service‑connected hearing loss | Hearing loss worsened (Veteran cites tinnitus onset) and merits a compensable rating | Objective audiograms demonstrate level I impairment both ears, producing a noncompensable rating; tinnitus claim must be adjudicated by RO | Denied—no compensable rating; audiometric evidence yields noncompensable evaluation; tinnitus referred to AOJ |
Key Cases Cited
- Scott v. McDonald, 789 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (limits Board discussion to relevant evidence and issues on appeal)
- Robinson v. Peake, 21 Vet. App. 545 (2008) (Board need only discuss evidence material to its decision)
