15-08 298
15-08 298
| Board of Vet. App. | May 31, 2017Background
- Veteran served on active duty (1966–1972); underwent cervical spine surgery on June 9, 2003 and a second surgery on October 18, 2003.
- VA established service connection for residuals of the cervical surgery (effective June 9, 2003); later granted 100% for loss of use of both hands and SMC R-1 effective May 23, 2008.
- Veteran contended loss of use of hands and need for aid and attendance began immediately after the June 9, 2003 surgery and sought earlier effective dates.
- Record shows fluctuating symptoms in 2003: initial postoperative improvement, recurrence of numbness, and by October 31, 2003 VA notes documenting inability to perform basic ADLs (e.g., could not brush his teeth; could no longer feed himself by Nov 4, 2003).
- Later medical and lay statements (2004–2015) describe progressive loss of hand function and dependence; private records characterize condition as quadriplegia by 2008.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effective date for 100% rating for loss of use of both hands | Veteran: loss of use began immediately after June 9, 2003 surgery; effective date should be June 9, 2003 | VA/Board: evidence shows functional loss became ascertainable later; current effective date was May 23, 2008 (contested) | Awarded effective date of October 31, 2003 (no sooner) |
| Effective date for SMC R-1 based on aid and attendance | Veteran: need for aid and attendance from June 9, 2003 onward | VA/Board: need for regular aid and attendance is ascertainable when ADL incapacity is documented; earlier dates not sufficiently supported | Awarded effective date of October 31, 2003 (no sooner) |
Key Cases Cited
- Scott v. McDonald, 789 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir.) (VA notice and duty-to-assist standards)
- Tucker v. West, 11 Vet. App. 369 (Vet. App.) (definition/analysis of loss of use)
- Harper v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 125 (Vet. App.) (effective date when increase is factually ascertainable)
- Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (Vet. App.) (benefit of the doubt rule for veterans claims)
