History
  • No items yet
midpage
12-17 725
12-17 725
| Board of Vet. App. | Aug 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served in the U.S. Navy, Apr 1968–Jan 1972; appeal from a Mar 2011 RO decision; Board hearing held Apr 2016; remand actions completed.
  • Service records show asymptomatic pes planus at enlistment; separation exam normal for feet and lower extremities; no documented knee, heart, hypertension, or erectile dysfunction in service records.
  • Post-service onset for asserted conditions occurred decades after separation; treatment records show gout/foot problems beginning ~2004–2007, hypertension and LVH diagnosed ~2009–2010, erectile dysfunction reported from 2005, and knee complaints much later.
  • Multiple VA medical examinations (2010, 2012, 2017) concluded it is "less likely than not" that the claimed conditions were caused or aggravated by service or by the veteran’s service-connected asbestos pulmonary disease or its treatments.
  • The Board gave limited weight to the veteran’s lay etiology opinions and to speculative private-provider opinions; found VA exams and contemporaneous records more probative.
  • Claim for increased rating for service‑connected asbestos pulmonary disease was remanded for clarification of January 2017 PFT results and medical opinion to apportion disability between service‑connected asbestosis and non‑service‑connected COPD.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Service connection — bilateral foot disability Foot conditions (gout, bunions, pes planus) caused/ aggravated by service activities or service exposures/meds No in-service symptomatic foot disease except asymptomatic pes planus; long post‑service onset; VA exams find no nexus; private opinions speculative Denied
Service connection — bilateral knee disability Knee pain began in service from physical duties and continued after separation Service records negative; delayed treatment decades later; VA records report later onset; VA examiner finds no nexus Denied
Service connection — heart condition (including secondary to asbestosis) Heart disease secondary to service or to service‑connected asbestos pulmonary disease No in‑service heart disease; diagnoses arose years later; VA examiners conclude heart condition more likely due to hypertension, not asbestosis Denied
Service connection — hypertension (including secondary to asbestosis) Hypertension caused or aggravated by service‑connected lung disease or its medications No in‑service HTN; essential HTN predated asbestosis; VA exams find no causal/ aggravating relationship with asbestosis or its meds Denied
Service connection — erectile dysfunction (including secondary to asbestosis) ED caused or aggravated by medications for service‑connected conditions ED onset post‑service; multiple non‑service‑connected risk factors (diabetes, HTN, hypogonadism) identified; VA exams find no nexus Denied

Key Cases Cited

  • Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163 (Fed. Cir.) (service-connection elements require current disability, in-service event, and nexus)
  • Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir.) (limits and guidance on lay evidence competence for medical etiology)
  • Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir.) (lay evidence may be competent in some medical matters but depends on complexity)
  • Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (Vet. App.) (benefit-of-the-doubt rule standard)
  • Stegman v. Derwinski, 3 Vet. App. 228 (Vet. App.) (speculative medical opinions insufficient to establish service connection)
  • Waters v. Shinseki, 601 F.3d 1274 (Fed. Cir.) (when to refer for medical opinion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 12-17 725
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Aug 31, 2017
Docket Number: 12-17 725
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.