History
  • No items yet
midpage
11-04 295
11-04 295
| Board of Vet. App. | Jan 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served active duty 1973–1997; appeal from RO Winston-Salem rating decision (Jan 2010) and remand (Jul 2014).
  • Claims on appeal: increased ratings for depressive disorder and low back pain (remanded), increased rating for right sciatic neuropathy, and TDIU.
  • VA examinations for sciatic neuropathy in Jan 2010 and Mar 2013 documented mild, predominantly sensory findings (decreased vibration sense, mild pain), normal strength/reflexes, and no atrophy.
  • Evidence of occupational impact: Veteran worked as a junior ROTC instructor through June 28, 2016, reported missed workdays and difficulty standing/sitting; employer confirmed missed hours and retirement/stop-work date.
  • Private physicians opined the Veteran was unemployable due to back pain and secondary depression; Board found medical evidence plus work history warranted grant of TDIU effective June 28, 2016.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Initial rating for depressive disorder (in excess of 10% before 3/27/13; >50% thereafter) Depression worsened and led to early retirement; current ratings too low VA relied on prior exams; remand needed for updated exam evidence REMANDED for new psychiatric exam and readjudication
Increased rating for mechanical low back pain (>20%) Back pain and functional loss (standing/sitting, flare-ups) justify higher rating Existing exams (2013) insufficient under Correia; further testing needed REMANDED for new back exam (ROM testing per Correia)
Increased initial rating for sciatic neuropathy, right ( >10%) Symptoms (pain, decreased sensation, functional impact) merit higher schedular rating Examinations show only mild, largely sensory impairment; no motor loss/atrophy DENIED — evidence supports only 10% (mild incomplete paralysis)
TDIU (total disability based on individual unemployability) Service‑connected physical and psychiatric disabilities render him unemployable (stopped work 6/28/2016) VA noted earlier periods of full‑time employment; needs proof of inability to secure/follow substantially gainful employment GRANTED effective June 28, 2016 (sufficient combined ratings and evidence of work‑incapacitating limitations)

Key Cases Cited

  • Hartman v. Nicholson, 483 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (once service connection is granted, defects in prior notice are not prejudicial)
  • Fenderson v. West, 12 Vet. App. 119 (Vet. App. 1999) (staged ratings required when medical evidence shows different levels of disability over time)
  • Correia v. McDonald, 28 Vet. App. 158 (Vet. App. 2016) (examination must record ROM testing for pain on active/passive motion and weight‑bearing/non‑weight‑bearing)
  • Geib v. Shinseki, 733 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (determination of employability is a factual question for the finder of fact, not a medical opinion)
  • Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (Vet. App. 1990) (benefit-of-the-doubt rule applies when evidence is in approximate equipoise)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 11-04 295
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Jan 31, 2017
Docket Number: 11-04 295
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.