History
  • No items yet
midpage
10-09 570
10-09 570
| Board of Vet. App. | May 31, 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served May 1966–May 1969, including service in the Republic of Vietnam; presumed exposure to herbicides (Agent Orange).
  • Multiple RO decisions: prior denials (notably Nov. 2004) became final; appeals and later development followed (remand in 2013; exams obtained).
  • Veteran sought reopening of claims for hypertension and osteoarthritis (right knee, hands, neck, back), and service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, respiratory disorder (emphysema/COPD), prostate cancer; also requested higher PTSD rating and earlier TDIU effective date.
  • Medical record: post-service diagnoses of osteoarthritis, hypertension (diagnosed post-2001), COPD/emphysema with smoking history, right-ear hearing loss and tinnitus, and psychiatric disorders including PTSD; mixed GAF scores and several substance-related psychotic episodes.
  • Procedural outcome: Board reopened hypertension claim and granted service connection for right-ear hearing loss and tinnitus; denied reopening/claims for osteoarthritis, left-ear hearing loss, respiratory condition, and prostate cancer; awarded 70% PTSD prior to May 22, 2012 (no higher) and denied earlier TDIU effective date than July 31, 2003. Hypertension and heart claims remanded for VA examination.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether new and material evidence reopens hypertension claim Veteran argues new evidence (post-2004 records, NAS IOM 2010) links hypertension to service/Agent Orange RO argued evidence is either cumulative or irrelevant to in-service incurrence Reopened (NAS 2010 creates suggestive association; remanded for exam)
Whether new and material evidence reopens osteoarthritis claims (knee, hands, neck, back) Veteran cites post-service treatment and lay statements of in-service knee injury RO contends records are cumulative/redundant and prior denial became final Not reopened (evidence not material)
Service connection for respiratory disease (COPD/emphysema), including secondary to herbicide exposure Veteran contends respiratory disease caused/related to in-service herbicide exposure RO/Board note no in-service evidence, smoking history, treating clinicians relate disease to tobacco; COPD/emphysema not on presumptive herbicide list Denied (no competent medical nexus; not presumptively related)
PTSD rating higher than 50% before May 22, 2012 and >70% thereafter Veteran seeks earlier and higher ratings; claims total occupational/social impairment RO/Board emphasize exam findings, GAFs, and that hospitalizations tied to substance abuse, not PTSD alone 70% granted prior to May 22, 2012; no rating above 70% at any time (100% denied)

Key Cases Cited

  • McLendon v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 79 (Vet. App. 2006) (low threshold for remand/examination where an indication of service connection exists)
  • Shade v. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 110 (Vet. App. 2010) (standard for "new and material" evidence to reopen claims)
  • Hensley v. Brown, 5 Vet. App. 155 (Vet. App. 1993) (service connection may be established by showing current disability causally related to service even if separation audiograms were normal)
  • Combee v. Brown, 34 F.3d 1039 (Fed. Cir. 1994) (service connection may be shown by proof of actual direct causation when presumptive criteria do not apply)
  • Shinseki v. Sanders, 129 S. Ct. 1696 (U.S. 2009) (claimant must show prejudice from any VCAA notice deficiency)
  • Hartman v. Nicholson, 483 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (once service connection is granted, notice defects are not prejudicial)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 10-09 570
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: May 31, 2016
Docket Number: 10-09 570
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.