History
  • No items yet
midpage
White v. Butler
171 U.S. 379
| SCOTUS | 1898
|
Check Treatment
171 U.S. 379 (1898)

WHITE
v.
BUTLER.
WHITE
v.
RUCKMAN.

Nos. 540, 541.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 21, 22, 1898.
Decided May 31, 1898.
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Boyd and Mr. Joseph H. Gaines for appellants.

Mr. Charles J. Faulkner for appellees.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court.

Butler, the appellee in the first of the above cases, was a storekeeper of the United States at the Hannis distillery at Martinsburg, West Virginia.

Ruckman, the appellee in the second case, was also a storekeeper at the same distillery.

The bill in each case is substantially like that in White v. Berry, ante, 366, just decided. The relief asked by Butler and Ruckman is the same as that asked by Berry, and the decree rendered in behalf of each was the same as that rendered in Berry's case.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just delivered in White v. Berry, the decree in each of the above cases must be

Reversed, and the causes remanded with directions to dismiss the bills.

Case Details

Case Name: White v. Butler
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 31, 1898
Citation: 171 U.S. 379
Docket Number: Nos. 540 and 541
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.