History
  • No items yet
midpage
California v. Holladay
159 U.S. 415
| SCOTUS | 1895
|
Check Treatment
159 U.S. 415 (1895)

CALIFORNIA
v.
HOLLADAY.

No. 566.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted November 1, 1895.
Decided November 11, 1895.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

*417 Mr. S.W. Holladay in person, and Mr. E. Burke Holladay for the motion.

Mr. W.F. Fitzgerald, Attorney General of the State of California, Mr. William Matthews, and Mr. William Craig opposing.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE:

The opinions of the Supreme Court of California in this case are reported 68 California, 439; 93 California, 241; 102 California, 661. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U.S. 65; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U.S. 244; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U.S. 361; and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U.S. 4; Hoadley v. San Francisco, 124 U.S. 639.

Writ of error dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: California v. Holladay
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 11, 1895
Citation: 159 U.S. 415
Docket Number: 566
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.