History
  • No items yet
midpage
County of Madison v. Warren
106 U.S. 622
| SCOTUS | 1883
|
Check Treatment
106 U.S. 622 (____)

COUNTY OF MADISON
v.
WARREN.

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. Charles P. Wise for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. T.C. Mather for the defendant in error.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a case tried and determined by the court without the intervention of a jury. The record does not show any stipulation in writing waiving a jury. The errors assigned all relate to rulings of the court on the trial, excepted to at the time, and presented by a bill of exceptions. The rule is well settled, that if a written stipulation waiving a jury is not in some way *623 shown affirmatively in the record, none of the questions decided at the trial can be re-examined here on writ of error. Kearney v. Case, 12 Wall. 275; Gilman v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co., 91 U.S. 603; Boogher v. New York Life Insurance Co., 103 id. 90; Hodges v. Easton, ante, p. 408.

For this reason, and without passing on any of the questions presented by the assignment of errors, the judgment is

Affirmed.

NOTE. — County of Alexander v. Kimball, error to the same court as the preceding case, was submitted by Mr. William B. Gilbert for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. T.C. Mather for the defendant in error. It involved the precise question decided in that case, and a judgment to the same effect was rendered.

Case Details

Case Name: County of Madison v. Warren
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 18, 1883
Citation: 106 U.S. 622
Docket Number: 1042
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.