History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barrett v. Gilbertson
2013 ND 35
| N.D. | 2013
|
Check Treatment

Filed 2/26/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2013 ND 22

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Kawo Flah, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20120357

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Dawn Marie Deitz, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, 402 1st Street NW, Mandan, ND 58554-3118, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Flah

No. 20120357

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Kawo Flah appeals a district court judgment of conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia after a jury trial.  Flah argues the prosecutor improperly vouched for the truth and veracity of the testimony of two police officers.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).   State v. Clark , 2004 ND 85, ¶ 9, 678 N.W.2d 765 (a prosecutor’s closing argument may properly draw reasonable conclusions and argue permissible inferences from the evidence).  

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom

Case Details

Case Name: Barrett v. Gilbertson
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 26, 2013
Citation: 2013 ND 35
Docket Number: 20120279
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.