History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gonzalez v. Witzke
2012 ND 60
| N.D. | 2012
|
Check Treatment

Filed 3/15/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 47

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Carlos Mendez Jr., Defendant and Appellant

No. 20110273

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jacob T. Rodenbiker, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.  Submitted on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.  Submitted on brief.

State v. Mendez

No. 20110273

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Carlos Mendez Jr. appealed from a district court criminal judgment entered after the district court revoked his probation .  On appeal, Mendez argues there is insufficient evidence to support the revocation of his probation.  Specifically, Mendez asserts the district court did not take judicial notice of his two criminal convictions, and the allegation that he violated the terms of his probation by using alcohol was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Case Details

Case Name: Gonzalez v. Witzke
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 2012
Citation: 2012 ND 60
Docket Number: 20110221
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.