History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Steen
2005 ND 199
| N.D. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
2005 ND 199

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Randal Steen, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 20050216.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Decided November 29, 2005

Randal R. Steen, pro se, North Dakota State Penitentiary, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521; submitted on brief.

Cynthia M. Feland, Assistant State's Attorney, 514 E. Thayer, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Randal Steen appeals from a trial court's order denying his motion for a new trial. Steen argues the trial court should have granted him a new trial because he is actually innocent of the charges for which he was convicted. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Steen's motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Steen
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 29, 2005
Citation: 2005 ND 199
Docket Number: 20050216
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.