History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. United States
1873 U.S. LEXIS 1344
| SCOTUS | 1874
|
Check Treatment
85 U.S. 662 (1873)
18 Wall. 662

JONES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.

Supreme Court of United States.

*663 Mr. P. Phillips, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. S.F. Phillips, Solicitor-General, contra.

Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court, to the effect that it was quite evident that the facts pleaded did not constitute any defence to the action, and that such being the settled law of the court it was not necessary to enter into any discussion of the question.[*]

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

NOTES

[*] United States v. Vanzandt, 11 Wheaton, 184; Bank of the United States v. Dandridge et al., 12 Id. 64; Dox et al. v. The Postmaster-General, 1 Peters, 318; United States v. Boyd et al., 15 Id. 187

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jan 19, 1874
Citation: 1873 U.S. LEXIS 1344
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.