History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hampton v. Rouse
15 Wall. 684
| SCOTUS | 1873
|
Check Treatment
82 U.S. 684 (1872)
15 Wall. 684

HAMPTON
v.
ROUSE.

Supreme Court of United States.

*685 Mr. W.W. Boyce, in support of the motion to amend, relied on the act of June 1st, 1872, above quoted; Mr. P. Phillips, contra, now moved to dismiss the writ.

*686 Mr. Justice SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

The case is before us on a motion to amend the writ. It bears teste on the 25th of February, 1873, and was made returnable on the first Monday of December, instead of the second Monday of October, then next ensuing. The commencement of the terms of this court was changed from the former to the latter time by the act of January 24th, 1873. The passage of this act was doubtless unknown to the clerk when he issued the writ. Authority to amend it in the particular in question is given by the third section of the "act to further the administration of justice," of June 1st, 1872.

THE MOTION IS GRANTED, and the amendment may be

MADE ACCORDINGLY.

Case Details

Case Name: Hampton v. Rouse
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 28, 1873
Citation: 15 Wall. 684
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.