History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jones v. La Vallette
1866 U.S. LEXIS 964
| SCOTUS | 1867
|
Check Treatment
72 U.S. 579 (____)
5 Wall. 579

JONES
v.
LA VALLETTE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. Janin now moved to dismiss the appeal, contending that appeal was not the proper form of bringing up the case.

Mr. Durant, contra.

The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave appellate jurisdiction to this court by writ of error, and it was held that under that act no cause could be brought here by appeal.[*]

The act of 1803 gave appellate jurisdiction by appeal "from final judgments and decrees in cases of equity, of admiralty, and maritime jurisdiction, and of prize or no prize." No other cases can be brought here in this mode, and the case in the record is of neither class. It must come here, if at all, upon writ of error.

The appeal must therefore be

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

NOTES

[*] Blaine v. Ship Charles Carter, 4 Dallas, 22.

Case Details

Case Name: Jones v. La Vallette
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 26, 1867
Citation: 1866 U.S. LEXIS 964
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.