History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cooke v. United States
1864 U.S. LEXIS 424
| SCOTUS | 1864
|
Check Treatment
69 U.S. 218 (1864)
2 Wall. 218

COOKE
v.
UNITED STATES.

Supreme Court of United States.

The CHIEF JUSTICE: It does not appear that the proposition has been accepted; and if not, the amount in controversy remains unaffected. But had the alleged reduction been made by an actual payment, the jurisdiction of the court would not be taken away. The jurisdictional facts existed at the time of issuing and serving the writ of error. By its issue and service the court obtained jurisdiction over the cause, and this jurisdiction once acquired, cannot be taken away by any change in the value of the subject of controversy.

MOTION OVERRULED AND CASE RETAINED.

Case Details

Case Name: Cooke v. United States
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 28, 1864
Citation: 1864 U.S. LEXIS 424
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.