History
  • No items yet
midpage
Guggenheim v. City of Goleta
2010 WL 5174984
| 9th Cir. | 2010
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket
598 F.3d 1061 (2010)

Daniel GUGGENHEIM; Susan Guggenheim; Maureen H. Pierce, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF GOLETA, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-56306.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 12, 2010.

Mark D. Alpert, Esquire, Robert S. Coldren, Esquire, Hart King & Coldren, PC, Santa Ana, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bruce C. Gridley, Esquire, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Los Angeles, CA, Amy Eileen Hoyt, Esquire, Burke Williams & Sorerensen, LLP, Riverside, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Guggenheim v. City of Goleta
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 12, 2010
Citation: 2010 WL 5174984
Docket Number: 06-56306
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.