History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wallen v. Williams
11 U.S. 278
| SCOTUS | 1812
|
Check Treatment
11 U.S. 278 (1812)
7 Cranch 278

WALLEN
v.
WILLIAMS.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 13, 1812.

Present ... . All the Judges.

JONES, for the Plaintiff in error.

P.B. KEY, contra.

*279 TODD, J.

The attachment to compel a performance of the decree was unavailing; and upon the return of it, the habere facias was issued in conformity with the practice in that state, as admitted by the counsel on both sides in the Court below. It was ordered as a matter of course, and no objection was made. If this motion should prevail, it will make the writ of error operate as a supersedeas, contrary to the intention of the act of Congress.

Motion overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Wallen v. Williams
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 13, 1812
Citation: 11 U.S. 278
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.