History
  • No items yet
midpage
Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co.
70 F.3d 26
| 5th Cir. | 1995
|
Check Treatment

70 F.3d 26

Barbara ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
R & H OIL & GAS COMPANY, Farrar Oilfield Service and
Equipment Company, and Tri-State Oil Services,
Inc., Defendants,
Tri-State Oil Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-60444.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1995.

Richard M. Martin, Jr., Cummings, Cummings, & Dudenhefer, New Orleans, LA, for Appellants.

Michael B. Wallace, Walker W. Jones, III, Joseph A. Ziemianski, Todd C. Richter, Chuck D. Barlow, Phelps Dunbar, Jackson, MS, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Tom S. Lee, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN

BANC

(Opinion August 29, 1995, 5th Cir., 1995; 63 F.3d 1326)

Before JOLLY, SMITH and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The petition for rehearing is DENIED, and no member of the panel or judge in regular active service having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (see FED.R.APP.P. 35 and 5TH CIR.R. 35), the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. Although the panel members have some disagreement regarding the interpretation of Mississippi law, the panel is of the unanimous view that the opinion in this case specifically reflects a result under the Mississippi law of punitive damages and is not to be construed as a comment on any similar case that might arise under the law of any other state.

Case Details

Case Name: Allen v. R & H Oil & Gas Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 16, 1995
Citation: 70 F.3d 26
Docket Number: 94-60444
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.