History
  • No items yet
midpage
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
401 F.3d 1007
| 9th Cir. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

401 F.3d 1007

UNITED STATES OF America, Plaintiff—Appellee,
v.
Alfred Arnold AMELINE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-30326.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 11, 2005.

Lori Harper Suek, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, Michael Rotker, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven F. Hubachek, Esq., Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

David M. Porter, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Sacramento, CA, Anthony R. Gallagher, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Amicus.

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Case Details

Case Name: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. ALFRED ARNOLD AMELINE, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 11, 2005
Citation: 401 F.3d 1007
Docket Number: 02-30326
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.