History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden
246 F.3d 1277
| 9th Cir. | 2001
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

Lead Opinion

ORDER; Dissent by Chief Judge SCHROEDER.

ORDER

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The opinion filed on August 22, 2000, published at 222 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir.2000) is WITHDRAWN. Submission of this case is DEFERRED pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in Walker v. Artuz, 208 F.3d 357 (2d Cir.), cert. granted sub nom Duncan v. Walker, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 480, 148 L.Ed.2d 454 (Nov. 13, 2000), or until further order of this court.






Dissenting Opinion

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge,

dissenting in part,

I agree that the petition for rehearing should be granted and the original opinion withdrawn. Waiting for the United States Supreme Court to decide whether a federal habeas petition tolls the year limitation period is useful, because it will let Jiminez know whether he will have any time to file a new or amended petition after he exhausts state remedies. It is not necessary to wait for Walker, however, to review the district court’s dismissal of this petition, since it was filed before the year period expired. Because it contained unexhaust-ed claims, it should have been dismissed without prejudice. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1605-06, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).

Case Details

Case Name: Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 24, 2001
Citation: 246 F.3d 1277
Docket Number: 99-15574
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.