History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daniel Bernstein v. United States Department of Justice United States Department of Commerce Department of State United States Department of Defense United States Arms Control
192 F.3d 1308
| 9th Cir. | 1999
|
Check Treatment

192 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 1999)

DANIEL J. BERNSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; MADELINE E. ALBRIGHT, United States Secretary of State; WILLIAM M. DALEY, United States Secretary of Commerce; WILLIAM COHEN, United States Secretary of Defense; KENNETH A. MINIHAN, Director, United States National Security Agency; JOHN B. HOLUM, Director, United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency; WILLIAM G. ROBINSON; GARY M. ONCALE; AMBASSADOR MICHAEL NEWLIN; CHARLES RAY; MARK KORO; GREG STARK; Defendants-Appellants.

No. 97-16686

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed September 30, 1999

HUG, Chief Judge:

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Bernstein v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 176 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 1999), is withdrawn.

Case Details

Case Name: Daniel Bernstein v. United States Department of Justice United States Department of Commerce Department of State United States Department of Defense United States Arms Control
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 30, 1999
Citation: 192 F.3d 1308
Docket Number: 97-16686
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.