History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arenson v. Southern University Law Center
43 F.3d 194
| 5th Cir. | 1995
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before JONES, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: [*]

Appellant Kenneth J. Arenson petitions this Court on rehearing for a clear ruling on his claim to attorney's fees, interest on his judgment, and relief based on his Title VII claim. For purposes of clarification, we confirm that Arenson is entitled to attorney's fees as a prevailing party at trial and on appeal and to interest. We remand to the district court for determination of [*] Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well- settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. *2 a reasonable fee and appropriate interest. However, Appellant's request for Title VII relief is denied because Arenson waived his Title VII claim by failing to seek a ruling on that issue from the Arenson I panel.

Except as specifically granted above, Appellant's Petition for Rehearing is DENIED. This case is REMANDED to the district court for determination of a reasonable attorney's fee and appropriate interest.

Clarification GRANTED; case REMANDED.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Arenson v. Southern University Law Center
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: May 18, 1995
Citation: 43 F.3d 194
Docket Number: 93-03544
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.