History
  • No items yet
midpage
Watts v. Singletary
1996 WL 362540
| 11th Cir. | 1996
|
Check Treatment

*1 Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, KRAVITCH, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule

1

35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the order of the majority of the court in denying the petition of appellee Carl Watts for en banc rehearing. This case presents important issues which, for reasons stated in Judge Carnes’s dissent, were erroneously decided.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Watts v. Singletary
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Jul 18, 1996
Citation: 1996 WL 362540
Docket Number: 95-4403
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.