History
  • No items yet
midpage
Deshawn Green v. Eloise Anderson
26 F.3d 95
9th Cir.
1994
Check Treatment

26 F.3d 95

Deshawn GREEN, Debby Venturella, and Diana P. Bertollt, on
behalf of themselves and all others situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Eloise ANDERSON, individually and in her official capacity
as Director, California Department of Social Services;
California Department of Social Services; and Thomas Hayes,
Director, California Department of Finance, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 93-15306.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994.
Decided April 29, 1994.
Amended June 13, 1994.

Theodore Garelis, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA, for defendants-appellants.

Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: GOODWIN, NORRIS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district court's order. Green v. Anderson, 811 F. Supp. 516 (E.D.Cal.1993). This panel will retain jurisdiction over the case.

2

This Court's Order, filed April 29, 1994, is hereby corrected by inserting the words "the preliminary injunction" between "AFFIRM" and "for."

3

The April 29, 1994 Order is redesignated ORDER FOR PUBLICATION.

Case Details

Case Name: Deshawn Green v. Eloise Anderson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 13, 1994
Citation: 26 F.3d 95
Docket Number: 93-15306
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.