History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burke v. Kaley
138 Mass. 464
| Mass. | 1885
|
Check Treatment
By the Court.

The facts that the defendant’s intestate had money in two savings banks, and that he drew out enough to pay his expenses, do not necessarily tend to prove any of the issues in the case. To admit them might open the door to a wide range of inquiry upon collateral issues; and we are of opinion that the court had the right to exclude them.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Burke v. Kaley
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 14, 1885
Citation: 138 Mass. 464
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.