History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cutter v. Evans
115 Mass. 27
| Mass. | 1874
|
Check Treatment
Gray, C. J.

The defendant, in the original action, might have pleaded in bar his bankruptcy and the proof of the plaintiffs’ claim against his estate; or might, at any time after the commencement of proceedings in bankruptcy, have applied to the court in which the action was pending for a stay of proceedings. U. S„ St. 1867, c. 176, § 21. Bennett v. Goldthwait, 109 Mass. 494. Bradford v. Rice, 102 Mass. 472. But not having done either, the judgment rendered against him was lawful and valid, and in the absence of fraud or collusion (of which the case affords no evidence) was conclusive both against him and against the surety on his bond to dissolve the attachment. Tracy v. Maloney, 105 Mass. 90. The injunction granted by the District Court of the United States, if it ever had any validity, was dissolved before the bringing of the present action. The result is that there must be Judgment for the plaintiffs.

Case Details

Case Name: Cutter v. Evans
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 9, 1874
Citation: 115 Mass. 27
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.