History
  • No items yet
midpage
Driscoll v. Marshall
81 Mass. 62
| Mass. | 1860
|
Check Treatment
Bigelow, J.

The written agreement signed by the plaintiff, an4 delivered simultaneously with the deed of the locus under which he claims title, operated as a license to the defendant to enter on the premises and cut and carry away the wood which he had bought of a former owner of the land. The wood sold to the defendant was expressly reserved in that agreement, and assented to by the plaintiff. An oral license to enter and take away wood under an agreement for its sale, while standing and *64growing on land, is valid, and, until revoked, is a justification of any entry made for the purpose of executing the contract of sale. Claflin v. Carpenter, 4 Met. 580.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Driscoll v. Marshall
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1860
Citation: 81 Mass. 62
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.