Upon the facts stated in the present case, the court are of opinion that the deed from Hayward to the plaintiff passed the legal interest of Hayward in the demanded premises to the plaintiff. It was a deed of warranty, and, as such, would pass all the present interest of the grantor. If that was an absolute estate in fee simple, such interest would pass thereby; but if the grantor had a less interest, it would pass that interest. A mere quitclaim deed would have passed the legal interest of Hayward in the mortgage to the plaintiff. Hunt v. Hunt, 14 Pick. 382. A warranty deed would be not less effectual in passing the mortgage interest, but would also secure to the grantee any title subsequently perfected by the grantor.
The ground of objection principally relied upon, that the plaintiff cannot maintain an action to foreclose such mortgage, inasmuch as the notes secured by the mortgage were not in fact transferred to the plaintiff at the time of his taking the deed from Hayward, cannot avail. It is true that the conditional judgment for foreclosure can only be entered upon proper-evidence of the amount of the debt secured by the mortgage
We think that the verdict that was entered for the defendant should be set aside, and the case remitted for further proceedings ; and that upon filing the notes secured by the mortgage, the plaintiff will be entitled to a conditional judgment upon the mortgage.
