History
  • No items yet
midpage
Salisbury v. Matthews
78 Mass. 333
| Mass. | 1859
|
Check Treatment
Dewey, J.

We perceive no sufficient reason for setting aside this award. This was, as we understand, a reference of the case in broad terms to a referee. This carried with it the case for which the plaintiff claimed damages, irrespectively of the precise technical form in which it was set out. Clearly one defective count would not vitiate a general award, if there was a good cause of action substantially set out in another. Forseth v. Shaw, 10 Mass. 253. Page v. Monks, 5 Gray, 492.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Salisbury v. Matthews
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Mar 15, 1859
Citation: 78 Mass. 333
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.