History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Austin
73 Mass. 51
| Mass. | 1856
|
Check Treatment
By the Court.

1. These jurors were rightly excluded-. When the trial was had, it had not been judicially determined that the jury had not the right to pass upon the law. The decision of that point in Commonwealth v. Anthes, 5 Gray, 185, has now rendered this question unimportant.

2. It is essential to the proper conduct of trials, that the extent to which books may be read to the jury should be within the discretion of the court. By that discretion, as exercised in this case, sufficient latitude was allowed to the defendant’s counsel. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Austin
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1856
Citation: 73 Mass. 51
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.