History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Berry
71 Mass. 93
| Mass. | 1855
|
Check Treatment
By the Court.

1. If a conviction of part of the offence could be a bar to this indictment—a point which we need not now decide—it must be a conviction, and not a mere prosecution. Commonwealth v. Drew, 3 Cush. 279.

2. It is undoubtedly true that a riot cannot ordinarily be committed by one person. It is the acting in concert, the unlawful combination, which constitutes the offence. The direction was strictly correct. Whether the other rioters were named in the indictment, or not, proof of a riot in which any two other persons joined with the defendant was sufficient.

Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Berry
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1855
Citation: 71 Mass. 93
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.