Upon the marriage of David Hall’s widow with the defendant, all her right or interest under the will, in the property for the conversion of which this suit is brought, ceased. Except so far as it might be needed for the payment of debts, it was the property of the plaintiff as legatee, and he might give it, subject only to its liability to be taken for such debts. And
The plaintiff was administrator and legatee. No formal transfer of property could be made, or was necessary.
This action, therefore, is not for the recovery of the property of a person deceased, found in the possession of the defendant at his death, but of property which the defendant received under a written contract of gift from the plaintiff, long since expired.
The defendant asked the presiding judge to rule that the action could not be maintained, for the reason that no action could be maintained by an heir or legatee for the recovery of any portion of the estate of a deceased person. The presiding judge refused so to rule, and held that, under the facts, the action could be maintained by the plaintiff in his own right We think the ruling right.
The evidence upon the question of damages, though not the most satisfactory, was clearly competent, and the instructions of the judge upon its effect subject to no just exception.
Exceptions overruled
