History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rossiter v. Peck
69 Mass. 538
Mass.
1855
Check Treatment
By the Court.

The record was clearly insufficient to show a valid judgment. Nothing can be presumed in favor of the *539jurisdiction, of courts or magistrates, having only a special or hmited jurisdiction; but the burden is upon those, who claim any rights under their proceedings, to show affirmatively that they acted within the limits of their jurisdiction. Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray, 124. In the present case, there is nothing to show that the defendant was ever served with process, or had any notice of the acti m in which the judgment was rendered. Prima facie, therefore, the justice had no right to take cognizance of the cause, or to render the judgment sued upon. Brown v. Cady, 19 Wend. 477. Exceptions sustained.

Case Details

Case Name: Rossiter v. Peck
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1855
Citation: 69 Mass. 538
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.