History
  • No items yet
midpage
Inhabitants of Hancock v. Hazzard
66 Mass. 112
| Mass. | 1853
|
Check Treatment
By the Court.

A collector of taxes, by accepting the office, takes the risk of the safe-keeping of the money he has actually received. His obligation is not regulated by the law of bailments, and the cases cited to that effect are inapplicable. He is a debtor, an accountant, bound to account for and pay over the money he has collected. The loss of his money, therefore, by theft or otherwise, is no excuse for non-performance; this is founded on the nature of his contract, and considerations of public policy. United States v. Prescott, 8 How. R. 578. It being a duty of the collector to account for and pay over to the treasurer; Inhabitants of Colerain v. Bell, 9 Met. 499, and the excuse of loss by theft being unavailing, the sureties in the bond are liable equally with the principal.

Judgment on the agreed facts for the plaintiffs.

Case Details

Case Name: Inhabitants of Hancock v. Hazzard
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1853
Citation: 66 Mass. 112
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.