History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gould v. Ward
21 Mass. 104
Mass.
1826
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The parties having by the reference chosen their own judges, and agreed to abide by their report, we are not at liberty to consider any question but that which is distinctly presented to us by the referees : and that is, whether an agreement on the part of the plaintiff to conceal the fact of his having purchased, is per se fraudulent, and so *109avoids the sale to him. And we are of opinion that it is mere matter of evidence, strong perhaps against the plaintiff, but still only evidence, capable of explanation, and therefore, according to the agreement of the parties, judgment must be for the plaintiff on the report.2

See Ward v. Gould, 5 Pick. 291.

Case Details

Case Name: Gould v. Ward
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Apr 15, 1826
Citation: 21 Mass. 104
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.