History
  • No items yet
midpage
Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of Tewksbury
19 Mass. 535
Mass.
1824
Check Treatment

The Court were of opinion, that the jury ought to have found the reason, why Pearson was not taxed ; whether it was on account of age, infirmity, or poverty, or through mistake, or from some other cause. The assessors might have *569properly omitted to tax him;1 which must depend on the circumstances existing at the time.

New trial granted.

Burton v. Wakefield, 4 N. Hamp. R. 47 ; Weare v. New Boston, 3 N. Hamp. B 203.

So a person does not acquire a legal settlement by residing in a town ten years together and paying takes there for any five of these ten years, if with in that time he is committed to gaol, and while there applies for and receives relief as a pauper from the gaoler. East Sudbury v. Sudbury, 12 Pick. 1. See also Westbrook v. Bowdoinham,7 Greenl. 363 ; Attleborough v. Middleborough, 10 Pick. 378

Case Details

Case Name: Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of Tewksbury
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1824
Citation: 19 Mass. 535
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.