History
  • No items yet
midpage
Day v. Whitney
18 Mass. 503
Mass.
1823
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The assignment gave Reed only an equitable interest in the note, the legal property still remaining in the plaintiff. The assignor, with the consent of the assignee, may maintain this action.

Judgment according to the verdict.

See Gibbs v. Merrill, 3 Taunt. 307; Tuttle v Cooper, 10 Pick. 282 287 Burgess v. Merrill, 4 Tax Tt. 468.

Case Details

Case Name: Day v. Whitney
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1823
Citation: 18 Mass. 503
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.