History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tinkham v. Meigs
16 Mass. 450
Mass.
1820
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We are all of opinion, that the costs claimed by the plaintiff were properly taxable. The hearing before the referees was a regular part of the proceedings in the suit; and all these costs were necessarily incurred by the plaintiff in the prosecution of his rights. It was not owing to him, that the report of the referees was not accepted ; if it had been, perhaps our opinion might have been different.

Case Details

Case Name: Tinkham v. Meigs
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1820
Citation: 16 Mass. 450
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.