History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hodges v. Hodges
9 Mass. 320
| Mass. | 1812
|
Check Treatment
By the Court.

Non constat that the defendant’s account was ever laid before the referees. If it was not, they could not arbitrate upon it. The agreement of the parties, evidenced * by the rule of the Court, was then so far not executed; and notwithstanding the general report of the referees, the defendant, if not otherwise precluded, may yet have his action upon the account filed by him, but on which the referees have not awarded. The judgment of the Common Pleas is affirmed, with costs for the defendant in error. (2)

Vide Webster vs. Lee, 5 Mass. Rep. 934.

Case Details

Case Name: Hodges v. Hodges
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1812
Citation: 9 Mass. 320
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.