Pennsylvania Court of Common P...1794Check Treatment
President.
Whether the dog was mad or not, he having bitten Fitzrandolph, the killing of him is justifiable. The dog was a nuisance: and every man may abate a nuisance. This is not the case of a dog set to guard property, and killed by a person interfering improperly. Such killing would not be justifiable.
The jury found a verdict for the defendant.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
