History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cavode v. M'Kelvey
1 Add. 56
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1793
Check Treatment
President.

In assumsit on a wager, “whether a decree in the court of Chancery would be reversed, on appeal to the house of Lords,” it was contended, that the event was not contingent, but certain ; for the law is clear, evident, and certain. But it was held, that the consideration was good, and the action lay. Settlement of a dispute is part of the consideration in this case, and *58seems to be the principal consideration in the view of the parties : that has not failed. There appears no fraud, nor concealment of circumstances, not equally in the knowledge of both parties.

There was a verdict for the defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Cavode v. M'Kelvey
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County
Date Published: Mar 15, 1793
Citation: 1 Add. 56
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.