You have requested our advice concerning foreign medical school graduates who apply to the State Board of Medical Education and Licensure, hereinafter called board, for a certificate of licensure to practice medicine and surgery in Pennsylvania. A foreign medical school graduate is defined as a citizen of the United States or a subject of a foreign country who has graduated from a medical school located outside the United States and its territories and possessions.
The licensing of physicians and surgeons is governed by the Medical Practice Act of June 3, 1911, P. L. 639, as amended, 63 PS §§401 to 418. Section 2 of that act
One of the proofs which must be submitted by an applicant to the board is that he attended certain courses in “. . . some reputable and legally incorporated medical school or college, or colleges, recognized as such by the Board . . .”.
“It shall further be the duty of the board, by inspection and otherwise, to ascertain the facilities and qualifications of medical institutions, colleges, or hospitals, outside this Commonwealth, whose graduates or interns desire to obtain medical licensure in this Commonwealth.”
Finally, the act
Upon this background the following questions must be considered:
I. What duty does the board have with regard to the licensure of foreign medical graduates generally?
II. May the board accept from a foreign medical graduate the passing of an American medical qualification examination given by the Educational Council for Foreign Medical Graduates in lieu of the board’s approval of the medical school from which the applicant graduated and/or in lieu of the board’s own examination of the applicant?
I. The provisions of the Medical Practice Act, noted
The procedure for obtaining a license is carefully set forth in the statute. Nothing therein
It cannot reasonably be argued that the board’s duty to ascertain the qualifications of medical colleges requires personal inspection by members of the board. Such a requirement plainly would be beyond the physical and financial resources of the board. However, since the board itself must pass final judgment on a particular school’s acceptability,
So, the foreign medical school graduate is entitled to have his credentials considered on the same basis as a graduate of an American medical school. He cannot be refused admission to the medical licensure examination on the ground that the medical school from which he graduated has not been approved by the board when, in fact, it has not been disapproved either.
II. The Educational Council for Foreign Medical Graduates represents the joint conclusion of the Federation of State Medical Boards, the Council on Medical Education and Hospitals of the American Medical Association, the Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Hospital Association that the foreign medical graduate problem should be handled at a national level.
As stated above,
Thus, while it cannot be said that one’s passing of the council’s examination may be accepted by the board in lieu of its own approval of the applicant’s medical school, such a conclusion begs the question since it fails to meet the facts underlying the situation. The board may accept the council’s examination in lieu of its own, and it may base its own approval of a medical school on information gained by the council. These two conclusions, coupled with our initial one that the board must act on the question of qualification of any particular foreign medical school, should allow the board to achieve substantial uniformity with other States in its approach to the foreign medical graduate.
In conclusion, therefore, it is our opinion that the State Board of Medical Education and Licensure: (1)
As amended by the Act of August 6,1941, P. L. 903, 63 PS §401a.
Act of June 3,1911, P. L. 639, sec. 5, as amended, 63 PS §405.
Id., sec. 7, as amended, 63 PS §409.
Id., sec. 5, as amended, 63 PS §405.
Id., sec. 5, as amended, 63 PS §406.
Id., sec. 4, as amended, 63 PS §402.
Ibid.
Id., sec. 4, as amended, 63 PS §403.
Id., sec. 4, as amended, 63 PS §404.
A law which did so discriminate could, conceivably, be attacked as violative of the equal protection clause found in Amendment XIV to the Federal Constitution.
There are minor exceptions, irrelevant to this opinion, found in section 12 of the act and in section 1 of the Act of August 10, 1951, P. L. 1154, 63 PS §§410 and 417.
See page 2, supra.
164 A. M. A. J. 417, 445 to 454.
It is anticipated that the council will begin operating in late 1957 or early 1958. See 164 A. M. A. J. 445.
See page 5, supra.
Medical Practice Act, sec. 6, as amended, 63 PS §407. We understand that the board does accord such recognition to the National Board of Medical Examiners. See Official Opinions of the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, 1923-1924, page 434.
