History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marcelli v. Fisher
46 Pa. D. & C. 577
| Pennsylvania Court of Common P... | 1942
|
Check Treatment
Eagen, J.,

— This involves an action in assumpsit before a justice of the peace. The summons was returnable June 2, 1942, between the hours of 6:00 and 7:00 p.m. An examination of the record discloses that plaintiff appeared on June 2,1942, and after hearing his testimony judgment was rendered in his favor against defendant, who was in default. The record fails to disclose at what hour plaintiff appeared before the justice of the peace and this is a fatal defect. In Courtright et al. v. Harringar, 7 Lane. 30, it is said: *578well as the day mentioned in the summons. This rule seems very strict, but it is too well settled by precedents in this Court for us to overthrow it. Lindsay vs. Sweeney, 6 Phila., 309; Smith vs. Featherston, 10 Phila., 306; Culver vs. Behee, 2 Kulp, 266; Keeley vs. Wenzel, 2 Kulp, 360; Perrigo vs. Nichols, 3 Kulp, 472.”

*577“Where a judgment is entered by default, the record should show that the plaintiff appeared at the hour as

*578In view thereof, now, December 18,1942, the exceptions and certiorari filed to the judgment of the justice of the peace are sustained and the judgment is reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Marcelli v. Fisher
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
Date Published: Dec 18, 1942
Citation: 46 Pa. D. & C. 577
Docket Number: no. 572
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.