Case Information
*1 I N T H E S U P R E M E C OU R T O F T H E S T A TE O F N E VADA S H E R I FF J O S E P H L O M B A R DO , ON N o . 84622 B E HA L F O F L A S V E GA S
M ET R O P O L I T AN P O L I C E F I LE D
D E P A R T M E N T ; AND T H E S T A TE O F N E VADA , M AY 1 3 2022
A pp e ll a n t s , , S S U I E J O TE A M O A C F v s . ond • e n s e R . t B n Y U UR T S RK E L [9] C O C E M E R P F Z L E AB I N T O W BR . H A E l D f RK E L C Y T U EP
O R D ER D I S M I SS I N G APPEA L
T h i s i s a n a pp ea l fr o m a n o r d e r r e m a nd i ng r e s pond e n t t o t h e c u s t ody o f t h e C l a r k C oun t y D e t e n ti on C e n t e r . E i gh t h J ud i c i a l D i s t r i c t C ou r t , C l a r k C oun t y ; J ac qu e li n e M . B l u t h , J udg e .
R e s pond e n t h a s m ov e d t o d i s m i ss t h e a pp ea l f o r l ac k o f j u r i s d i c ti on c on t e nd i ng t h a t t h e r e i s no s t a t u t e o r c ou r t r u l e t h a t p r ov i d e s f o r a n a pp ea l fr o m a n o r d e r r e m a nd i ng a d e f e nd a n t fr o m t h e c u s t ody o f t h e N e v a d a s t a t e D e p a r t m e n t o f C o rr ec ti on s t o t h e c oun t y d e t e n ti on ce n t e r . A pp e ll a n t S h e r i ff J o s e ph L o m b a r do , on b e h a l f o f t h e L a s V e g a s M e t r opo lit a n P o li ce D e p a r t m e n t oppo s e s t h e m o ti on a nd a r gu e s t h a t w i t hou t t h i s a pp e a l , h e w ill h a v e no r e m e dy t o o b j e c t t o t h e t r a n s po r t a t i on o f r e s pond e n t t o h i s c u s t ody . T h i s c ou r t h a s j u r i s d i c ti on t o c on s i d e r a n a pp ea l on l y w h e n t h e a pp ea l i s a u t ho r i ze d by s t a t u t e o r c ou r t r u l e . T a y l o r C on s t r . C o . v . H ilt on H o t e l s , 100 N e v . 207 , 678 P . 2d 1152 ( 1984 ) . N o c ou r t r u l e o r s t a t u t e p r ov i d e s f o r a n a pp ea l fr o m t h e c h a ll e ng e d o r d e r .
T h i s c ou r t ac kno w l e dg e s t h a t S h e r i ff L o m b a r do r ece n tl y f il e d a p e titi o n f o r a n e x t r a o r d i n a r y w r it i n t h i s c ou r t c h a ll e n g i ng t h e s a m e o r d e r . I n t h a t p e t i ti o n S h e r i f f L o m b a r d o a r g u e d t h a t h e h a d n o a d e q u a t e l e g a l r e m e dy t h e r e by w a rr a n ti ng a n e x t r a o r d i n a r y r e m e dy . T h i s c ou r t e x e r c i s e d
152 1 t o *2 its discretion and declined to entertain the petition for extraordinary writ relief. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't v. Dist. Ct. (State), Docket No. 84459 (Order Denying Petition, April 1, 2022). This does not give the court jurisdiction over this direct appeal.
Accordingly, we grant the motion and ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
1 /4.1Z4,0 J. Silver
.
, J. Cadish
, J. cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge
Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. James M. Bixler, Senior Judge
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Marquis Aurbach Coifing
Special Public Defender
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(C” 1947A 410. 2