History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct.
84163
| Nev. | Mar 11, 2022
|
Check Treatment

*1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TIMOTHY HOWARD JOHNSON, Petitioner, vs. THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PERSHING; AND THE HONORABLE JIM C. SHIRLEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents.

No. 84163

FILED

MAR 112022

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original pro se petition seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to take action on four motions allegedly filed.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). We reiterate that "[p]etitioner[] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

It is so ORDERED.

Parraguirre

*2 cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Timothy Howard Johnson Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. The Eleventh Dist. Ct.
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 11, 2022
Docket Number: 84163
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.